HANYA MENGIKUTI FORMAT : Yuli Filasari, staf IT, saat memberikan kesaksian di PN Kabupaten Kediri, (23/4/2020)
KEDIRI – Para saksi yang diajukan oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum (JPU) Tommy Marwanto, S.H dan Iskandar, S,H dalam sidang lanjutan kasus dugaan penggunaan gelar palsu oleh Bakal Calon Bupati Kediri, Supadi SE, justru terkesan memperingan dakwaan. Dua saksi yang dihadirkan itu, Melisa dan Yuli Filasari, keduanya staf IT di kantor Desa Tarokan, mengaku yang mereka dengar terkait SE di belakang Supadi itu adalah singkatan nama.
“Sekitar Januari 2019, saya pernah bertanya langsung ke Pak Supadi, soal tulisan SE itu, dia jawabnya itu singkatan nama,”ujar Melisa, di depan majelis hakim yang dipimpin oleh Guntur Pambudi Wijaya S.H. Hanya saja, Supadi saat itu tidak menjelaskan SE itu singkatan dari apa.
Sementara itu, Yuli Filasari, di depan majelis hakim menjelaskan dia tidak pernah bertanya langsung soal SE yang di belakang nama Supadi itu apakah gelar atau singkatan nama. Yuli yang masuk jadi staf IT sejak 2018 itu, tidak mengetahui secara pasti kapan tulisan SE disematkan di belakang Supadi itu mulai kapan dan siapa yang memasukkan. Sebab, saat dia masuk sebagai IT, di program computer sudah ada. “Saya hanya mengikuti form yang sudah ada, SE itu sudah ada di sana, saya tidak tahu kapan mulai ada,”tandasnya.
Sementara itu, Eryck Andikha SH, penasehat hukum Supadi, usai sidang menjelaskan jika pertanyaan Melisa itu dilakukan pada sekitar Januari 2019, berarti itu jauh sebelum kasus itu dipersoalkan. “Berarti sejak awal SE itu memang bukan gelar. Yang ada hanya asumsi orang saja bahwa SE itu adalah gelar,”tandasnya.
Seperti diberitakan sebelumnya, Supadi, Bakal Calon Bupati Kediri dilaporkan ke polisi dengan dugaan menggunakan gelar palsu SE. Kini kasusnya dalam proses persidangan di PN Kabupaten Kediri, dengan majelis hakim Guntur Pambudi Wijaya SH didampingi hakim anggota Fahmi Hary Nugroho SH, dan Mellina Nawang Wulan SH, dengan JPU Iskandar SH dan Tomy Marwanto,SH. Sedangkan Supadi didampingi dua pengacaranya yaitu Prayoga S.H, Eryck Andikha S.H, dan Sukamto S.H. (mam)
Witness Admits Supadi SE Abbreviation of Name
KEDIRI – The witnesses presented by the Public Prosecutor (Prosecutor) Tommy Marwanto, S.H and Iskandar, S, H in the follow-up case of the alleged use of a fake title by a candidate for the Regent of Kediri, Supadi SE, actually seemed to ease the indictment. The two witnesses presented, Melisa and Yuli Filasari, both IT staff at the Tarokan Village office, claimed that what they heard about the SE behind Supadi was an abbreviation of the name.
“Around January 2019, I once asked Pak Supadi directly, about the SE writing, he said the answer stands for name,” said Melisa, in front of the panel of judges led by Guntur Pambudi Wijaya S.H. It’s just that, Supadi at that time did not explain what the SE stands for.
Meanwhile, Yuli Filasari, in front of the panel of judges, explained that she had never asked directly about the SE behind the name Supadi, whether the title or abbreviation of the name. Yuli, who has been an IT staff member since 2018, did not know for sure when the SE writing was embedded behind Supadi when and who submitted it. Because, when he entered as IT, the computer program already existed. “I just followed the form that was already there, the SE was already there, I don’t know when it started,” he said.
Meanwhile, Eryck Andikha SH, Supadi’s legal advisor, after the hearing explained that Melisa’s question was conducted around January 2019, meaning that it was long before the case was questioned. “It means that from the beginning the SE was indeed not a title. There are only people’s assumptions that the SE is a title, “he said.
As reported previously, Supadi, a candidate for the Regent of Kediri was reported to the police on suspicion of using a fake SE title. Now the case is in the trial process in the District Court of Kediri, with the panel of judges Guntur Pambudi Wijaya SH accompanied by judges members Fahmi Hary Nugroho SH, and Mellina Nawang Wulan SH, with prosecutors Iskandar SH and Tomy Marwanto, SH. Whereas Supadi was accompanied by two of his lawyers namely Prayoga S.H, Eryck Andikha S.H, and Sukamto S.H. (mam)
Tinggalkan Balasan